Jurisprudential discussion about eventual deciet and guilt of representation in homicide offenses resulting in traffic accidents
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v1i2.59Keywords:
Eventual deceit, accident, guilt of representationAbstract
This article is a case report based on the study of the Superior Court of the Judicial District of Bogota Judgement – Criminal Board (Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogotá –Sala Penal) handed down on July 28th, 2009, in amending the classification of behavior of manslaughter by way of possible fraud in a traffic accident.
Downloads
References
Código Penal, Ley 599 de 2000.
LETNER, A. (2010). Dolo eventual y culpa con representación (Problemas y consecuencias que traen aparejadas su distinción y su posterior aplicación en casos vinculados con el tráfico automotor). Recuperado del link www.unidosjusticia.org.ar/archivo/LETNER_Dolo_eventual.pdf el 20 de febrero de 2010.
SÁNCHEZ, E. (2007). La Dogmática de la Teoría del Delito. Evolución científica del sistema del delito. Bogotá D. C.: Universidad Externado de Colombia.
TRIBUNAL SUPERIOR DEL DISTRITO JUDICIAL DE BOGOTÁ, SALA PENAL (2009). Sentencia de 28 de julio de 2009, magistrado ponente José Joaquín Urbano Martínez.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This journal provides free and immediate access to its content (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages), under the principle that making research available to the public free of charge supports greater global knowledge exchange. This means that the authors transfer the Copyrights to the journal, so that the material can be copied and distributed by any means, as long as the authors’ recognition is maintained, and the articles are not commercially used or modified in any way.
