Pedagogical innovation from the perspective of professional learning communities

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v8i1.338

Keywords:

collaboration, pedagogical innovation, professional learning communities, socio-constructivism

Abstract

This study aimed to verify the relationship between the participation of teachers in professional learning communities and the teaching practices related to the socio-constructivist model. For this purpose, a quantitative non-experimental model with a cross-sectional design was implemented, using the results of the survey entitled “Teaching and learning international survey”, which was applied by the OECD in 2008 in 24 countries. The results of the conducted study determined that the dimensions of professional learning communities have a weak positive relationship with the categories of teaching practices. Additionally, the investigation addressed the differences in the responses of teachers according to variables, such as age, gender, teaching experience, and level of education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Ana María Sánchez Cortés, Escuela de Administración de Negocios
    Economista. Máster en Economía. Doctora en Educación (c). Docente Asociada.

References

Beltrán, E. & Jové, G. (2013). La inestabilidad docente y la homeostasis de la innovación educativa. Estudios Sobre Educación, 24, 61-82.

De la Herrán, A. (2011). La madurez institucional como constructo pedagógico. En E. Sebastián-Heredero & M. Martin-Bris (Eds.), Transferencia del conocimiento a partir de prácticas educativas en los contextos español y brasileño (pp.145-163). Alcalá de Henares, Madrid: Universidad de Alcalá.

Furco, A. & Moely, B. (2012). Using learning communities to build faculty support for pedagogical innovation: a multi – campus study. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(1), 129-153.

Harris, A. (2011). Reforming systems: Realizing the fourth way. Journal of Educational Change, 12, 159-171.

Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL).

Hord, S. (2004). Professional learning communities: An overview. En Author (Ed.), Learning together, leading together: Changing schools through professional learning communities (pp. 5-14). United States: Teachers College Press y National Staff Development Council.

Hord, S. (2008). Evolution of the professional learning community. Journal of Staff Development, 29(3), 10-13.

Hord, S. (2009). Professional learning communities: Educators work together toward a shared purpose – improved student learning. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 40-43.

Kruse, S., Louis, K.S. & Bryk, A. (1994). Building professional community in schools. Issues in Restructuring Schools, 6, 3-6.

Kruse, S.D. & Louis, K.S. (abril, 1993). An emerging framework for analyzing school-based professional community. Trabajo presentado en la Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Atlanta, GA. Resumen recuperado de http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED358537.pdf.

Louis, K., Marks, H. & Kruse, S. (1996). Teachers' professional community in restructuring schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(4), 757-798.

Margalef, L. (2011). Encouraging teachers’ and students’ innovation with the support of teacher learning communities. C.E.P.S Journal, 1(1), 133-152.

Martínez Lozano, J., Vergel Ortega, M. & Zafra Tristancho, T. (2016). Ambiente de aprendizaje lúdico de las matemáticas para niños de la segunda infancia. Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 7(2), 17-25. Recuperado de http://revistalogos.policia.edu.co/index.php/rlct/article/view/234/274

McEachron, D.L., Bach, C. & Sualp, M. (2012). Digital Socrates: a system for disseminating and evaluating best practices in education. Campus – Wide Information Systems, 29(4), 226-237.

Navarro Díaz, L., Sandoval B., R., & Caballero T, T. (2013). Algunos puntos clave para pensar los retos de las ciencias sociales hoy. Una mirada desde la comunicación y la posibilidad crítica del ser humano. Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 5(1), 75-83. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v5i1.8

Ortega, M. V., Frank, J. V. S., & Nieto, E. L. F. (2016). Ponderación de factores en la universidad venezolana. Hojas y Hablas, 12(12), 7-19.

PNUD. (2015). Educación de calidad: Para una ciudad y un país equitativos. Recuperado de http://www.co.undp.org/content/dam/colombia/docs/Pobreza/undp-co-educacioncalidad-2015.pdf.

Quintero-Ortega, S.P., Díaz-Correa, A.M. & Ortíz-Russi, G.P. (2015). Modelo de mediaciones pedagógicas y tecnológicas para entender e incorporar adecuadamente procesos pedagógicos-comunicativos-tecnológicos de ambientes virtuales de aprendizaje en la Policía Nacional de Colombia. Revista Logos, Ciencia & Tecnología, 6(2), 188-197.

Vieluf, S., Kaplan D., Klieme, E. & Bayer, S. (2012). Teaching practices and pedagogical innovations: Evidence from TALIS. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264123540-en.

Published

2016-12-21

Issue

Section

Research articles / Original articles

How to Cite

Pedagogical innovation from the perspective of professional learning communities. (2016). Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 8(1), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v8i1.338