Maritime security against illicit drug trafficking: A systematic review of the literatura
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v15i2.1777Keywords:
maritime security, Colombia, drug trafficking, transnational crime, scientific researchAbstract
Illegal Drug Trafficking (IDT) poses a threat to maritime security and destabilizes states. In Colombia, this threat is imminent and affects the country by positioning it as one of the major drug producers. However, scientific research on maritime security and IDT in Colombia is limited. This article applied literature review techniques, combining bibliometric and systematic analyses. Using the PRISMA methodology, searches were conducted in the Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and Scielo databases, as well as in national official sources. The purpose was to identify the methodological aspects and conceptual elements that make up the global maritime security agenda related to IDT. Out of the 936 identified documents, 45 were selected that met the established criteria. The main findings suggest that maritime security encompasses multiple domains, dimensions, characteristics, and practices to combat maritime threats, and a conceptual framework is proposed. The methodological characteristics found are discussed, and their application in future research in Colombia is suggested.
Downloads
References
Acosta Sánchez, M. A. (2020). Estrategias de seguridad marítima y medios contra la inmigración irregular: análisis comparado de España, Unión Europea y Unión Africana. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, 40, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.40.12
Ardila Ardila, M. (2012). Potencia regional secundaria en definición: Colombia entre Sur y Centroamérica. Papel Político, 17(1), 293-319.
Ariza-Colpas, P. P., Ayala-Mantilla, C. E., Shaheen, Q., Piñeres-Melo, M. A., Villate-Daza, D. A., Morales-Ortega, R.C., De-la-Hoz-Franco, E., Sanchez-Moreno, H., Aziz, B. S., & Afzal, M. (2021). SISME, Estuarine monitoring system based on IOT and machine learning for the detection of SaltWedge in aquifers: Case study of the Magdalena River Estuary. Sensors, 21(7), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21072374
Bahoo, S., Alon, I., & Paltrinieri, A. (2020). Corruption in international business: A review and research agenda. International Business Review, 29(4), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101660
Bastari, A., Marjono M., Moeljadi, H. & Fanani, Z. (2019). The relationship model of maritime culture and state policy towards national resilience. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 2277-3878. https://www.ijrte.org/portfolio-item/B3165078219/
Bauk, S. (2020). Performances of some autonomous assets in maritime misions. International Journal on Marine Navigation and Safety of Sea Transportation, 14(4), 875-881. https://doi.org/10.12716/1001.14.04.12
Bueger, C. (2013). Communities of security practice at work? The emerging African maritime security regime. African Security, 6(3-4), 297-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/19392206.2013.853579
Bueger, C. (2014). Piracystudies: Academic responses to the return of an ancient menace. Cooperation and Conflict, 49(3), 406-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836713484117
Bueger, C. (2015a). What is maritime security? Marine Policy, 53, 159-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.12.005
Bueger, C. (2015b). From dusk to dawn? Maritime domain awareness in southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 37(2), 157-182. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24916578
Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2017). Beyond seablindness: A new agenda for maritime security studies. International Affairs, 93(6), 1293-1311. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iix174
Bueger, C., & Edmunds, T. (2020). Blue crime: Conceptualising transnational organised crime at sea. Marine Policy, 119, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2020.104067
Bueger, C., & Stockbruegger, J. (2022). Maritime security and the Western Indian Ocean’s militarisation dilemma. African Security Review, 31(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10246029.2022.2053556
Bueger, C., Edmunds, T., & Ryan, B. J. (2019). Maritime security: The uncharted politics of the global sea. International Affairs, 95(5), 971-978. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz145
Cai, P. (2017). The South China Sea: Troubled Waters in China-U.S. Relations. China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies, 3(2), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.1142/S2377740017500130
Callahan, J. L. (2014). Writing literature reviews: A reprise and update. Human Resource Development Review, 13(3), 271-275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314536705
Chintoan-Uta, M., & Ramos Silva, J. (2017). Global maritime domain awareness: A sustainable development perspective. WMU Journal of Maritime Affairs, 16(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13437-016-0109-5
Centro Internacional de Investigación y Análisis Contra el Narcotráfico Marítimo (CMCON). (2016). Dinámica narcotráfico marítimo Colombia y la región año 2016. Cartagena de Indias: Armada de Colombia. https://cimcon.armada.mil.co/content/informeanual-o-2016
Centro Internacional de Investigación y Análisis Contra el Narcotráfico Marítimo (CMCON). (2017). Dinámica narcotráfico marítimo Colombia y la región año 2017. Cartagena de Indias: Armada de Colombia. https://cimcon.armada.mil.co/content/informeanual-o-2017
Centro Internacional de Investigación y Análisis Contra el Narcotráfico Marítimo (CMCON). (2018). Dinámica del narcotráfico marítimo año 2018. Cartagena de Indias: Armada de Colombia. https://cimcon.armada.mil.co/content/informe-anual-o-2018
Centro Internacional de Investigación y Análisis Contra el Narcotráfico Marítimo (CMCON). (2019). Dinámica del narcotráfico marítimo año 2019. Cartagena de Indias: Armada de Colombia. https://cimcon.armada.mil.co/content/informe-anual-o-2019
Centro Internacional de Investigación y Análisis Contra el Narcotráfico Marítimo (CMCON). (2020). Dinámica mundial del narcotráfico marítimo 2020. Cartagena de Indias: Armada de Colombia. https://cimcon.armada.mil.co/content/informe-anual-o-2020
Centro Internacional de Investigación y Análisis Contra el Narcotráfico Marítimo (CMCON). (2021). Dinámica mundial del narcotráfico marítimo 2021. Cartagena de Indias: Armada de Colombia. https://cimcon.armada.mil.co/content/informe-anual-o-2021
Centro Internacional de Investigación y Análisis Contra el Narcotráfico Marítimo (CMCON). (2022). Modalidades del narcotráfico marítimo, técnicas y métodos. Cartagena de Indias: Armada de Colombia. https://acortar.link/XPrfGF
Comisión Colombiana del Océano (CCO). (2020, 31 de marzo). Conpes 3990: Colombia potencia bioceánica sostenible 2030. https://cco.gov.co/cco/publicaciones/83-publicaciones/794-conpes-colombiapotencia-bioceanica-sostenible.html
Corbane, C., Najman, L., Pecoul, E., Demagistri, L., & Petit, M. (2010). A complete processing chain for ship detection using optical satellite imagery. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31(22), 5837-5854. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.512310
Ferenhof, H. A., Vignochi, L., Selig, P. M., Rojas Lezana, Á. G., & Campos, L. (2014). Environmental management systems in small and medium-sized enterprises: An analysis and systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 44-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.027
García-Llave, R., & Chávez Perdomo, L. E. (2022). Asistencia mutua en el marco del Derecho Internacional del Mar contra el tráfico ilícito de drogas por vía marítima: el caso de España y Colombia. Revista Electrónica de Estudios Internacionales, (43), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.17103/reei.43.14
Gómez-Pretel, W., & Acebedo-Navas, C. (2020). Riesgos de seguridad física de plataformas y unidades offshore oil & gas en el mar Caribe colombiano. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, 18(32), 799-815. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.671
Interpol. (16 de mayo, 2023). Objetivos policiales mundiales. https://www.interpol.int/es/Quienes-somos/Estrategia/Objetivospoliciales-mundiales
Jiménez, F. (2012). Salvage and maritime safety in the sea: The mediterranean Spanish case. Journal of Maritime Research, 9(2), 61-66. https://www.jmr.unican.es/index.php/jmr/article/view/182
Jong, M., Joss, S., Schraven, D., Changjie, Z., & Weijnen, M. (2015). Sustainable smart resilient low carbon eco–knowledge cities; making sense of a multitude of concepts promoting sustainable urbanization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 25-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.004
Kishor, J. (2019). Journals on information literacy: Citation analysis and social impact metrics. The Serials Librarian, 77(1-2), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1641457
Klein, N., Guilfoyle, D., Karim, M., & McLaughlin, R. (2020). Maritime autonomous vehicles: New frontiers in the law of the sea. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 69(3), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020589320000226
Lee, Y. (2018). Maritime merchandise trade in Southeast Asia: Opportunities and challenges. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 14(1), 51-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2018.1482665
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X.-J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical Big Data research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
Lindskov Jacobsen, K., & Larsen, J. (2019). Piracy studies coming of age: A window on the making of maritime intervention actors. International Affairs, 95(5), 1037-1054. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz099
Lynce de Faria, D. M. (2020). The impact of cybersecurity on the regulatory legal framework for maritime security. Journal of International Relations, 11(2), 163-184. https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.11.2.10
Marey, R. (2012). Metodología de identificación de imputados desconocidos en la Policía de Investigaciones de Chile. En Tudela Poblete, P. (Ed.). Buenas prácticas para el análisis delictual en América Latina (pp. 99-112). Fundación Paz Ciudadana. https://www.pensamientopenal.com.ar/system/files/2014/12/doctrina34826.pdf
Md Khudzari, J., Kurian, J., Tartakovsky, B., & Raghavan, G. V. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of global research trends on microbial fuel cells using Scopus database. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 136, 51-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2018.05.002
Min, H., Shin, S.-S., Lim, Y.-K., Park, J.-W., & Cho, Y. K. (2014). The use of X-ray scanning technology for improving maritime security: An exploratory study. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 15(2), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2014.11517341
Ministerio de Defensa Nacional, MINDEFENSA. (2019). Política de defensa y seguirdad PDS - Para la legalidad, el emprendimiento y la equidad. https://www.mindefensa.gov.co/irj/go/km/docs/Mindefensa/Documentos/ descargas/Prensa/Documentos/politica_defensa_deguridad2019.pdf
Mishra, R. (2017). Code of conduct in the South China sea: More discord than accord. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 13(2), 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2017.1412098
Mugridge, D.(2009). Malaiseor farce - The international failure of maritime security. Defense & Security Analysis, 25(3), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/14751790903201448
Musili Wambua, P. (2016). Legal frameworks for maritime safety and security in the Indian Ocean Region: Prospects and proposals. Maritime Affairs: Journal of the National Maritime Foundation of India, 12(2), 71-77. https://doi.org/10.1080/09733159.2016.1239360
Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). (1995). Orden Ejecutiva 12978 (Blocking assets and prohibiting transactions with significant narcotics traffickers). Washington D. C. https://ofac.treasury.gov/additionalofac-resources/ofac-legal-library/executiveorders-eo
Oluleke Aruwajoye, A., & Gonzáles Taco, P. W. (2019, 10-14 novembro). 33° Congresso de Pesquisa e Ensino em Transporte da ANPET. Fatores que influenciam na prática da mobilidade corporativa: uma revisão bibliométrica. 2951-2962. https://acortar.link/bLz1ib
Organización de Naciones Unidas (ONU). (13 de 3 de 2017). Objetivos de desarrollo sostenible.https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/es/2017/03/elcombate-a-las-drogas-apoya-el-desarrollosostenible-afirma-unodc/
Osorio Dussan, L. H. (2017). Globalización y narcotráfico: amenazas al desarrollo de los intereses marítimos colombianos, una visión desde la Escuela Superior de Guerra. Ensayos sobre Estrategia Marítima, 2(6), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.25062/2500-4735.635
Ou, Z., & Zhu, J. (2008). AIS Database powered by GIS technology for maritime safety and security. The Journal of Navigation, 61(4), 655-665. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463308004888
Paul, J., & Criado, A. (2020). The art of writing literature review: What do we know and what do we need to know? International Business Review, 29(4), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101717
Parlamento Europeo. (2011). Reglamento (UE) No 1168/2011 del Parlamento europeo y del consejo. Estrasburgo. http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2011/1168/oj
Peng, X., & Dai, J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of neutrosophic set: Two decades review from 1998 to 2017. Artificial Intelligence Review, 53(1), 199-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9652-0
Peñaranda Lizcano, N. J., Ducuara Ramírez, D. G., Delgado Villota, D. M., & Murillo Pineda, Y. A. (2021). Migración del sistema de información para la administración del talento humano de la Policía Nacional: una revisión sistemática. Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 13(3), 112-127. https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v13i3.1422
Pólitica Nacional del Océano y de los Espacios Costeros, PNOEC. (2017). Comisión Colombiana del Océano (CCO).
Putra A., I. N., Hakim, A., Paramono, S. H., & Leksono, A. S. (2017). The effect of strategic environment change toward Indonesia maritime security: Threat and opportunity. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(16), 6037-6044. https://www.ripublication.com/ijaer17/ijaerv12n16_81.pdf
Quindimil-López, J.-A. (2012). La Unión Europea, FRONTEX y la seguridad en las fronteras marítimas. ¿Hacia un modelo europeo de “seguridad humanizada” en el mar? Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo, 16(41), 57-118. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/RDCE/article/view/39500
Riddervold, M., & & Guri, R. (2016). Trick and treat: How the Commission and the European Parliament exert influence in EU foreign and security policies. Journal of European Integration, 38(6), 687-702. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2016.1178737
Rodríguez Ruiz, H. M. (2020). Seguridad marítima y seguridad integral marítima, una visión académica. Ensayos sobre Estrategia Marítima, 4(12), 84-112. https://doi.org/10.25062/2500-4735.2296
Rojas-Solís, J. L., Hernández-Cruz, S., Morales-Franco, E., & Toldos Romero, M. d. (2020). Ethical and methodological issues in the study of dating violence among young Mexicans: A systematic review. Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 12(3), 99-114. https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v12i3.1241
Rosenberg, D. (2008). Maritime security in the South China sea: Coordinating coastal and user state priorities. Ocean Development & International Law, 39(1), 51-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00908320701641602
Rublee, M. R. (2017). Time to worry, mate? The construction of maritime security perceptions down under. Pacific Focus, 32(3), 351-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/pafo.12101
Ryan, B. J. (2019). The disciplined sea: A history of maritime security and zonation. International Affairs, 95(5), 1055-1073. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz098
Segura Manonegra, J. A. (2020). Objetivos nacionales: concepto y formulación. En Pastrana-Buelvas, E., Reith, S., & Cabrera-Ortiz, F. (Eds.). Identidad e intereses nacionales de Colombia (pp. 217-242). Sello Editorial ESDEG. https://doi.org/10.25062/9789585250499.02
Suseto, B., Othman, Z., & Mohd Razalli, F. (2019). Assessing the evolution of maritime strategy in the Asia Pacific. Assessing the Evolution of Maritime Strategy, 23(2), 87-101. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.41709
Susilo, A. K., Putra, I. N., Ahmadi, & Suharyo, O. S. (2019). Analysis of national maritime security strategy as an effect of regional development using SWOT, fuzzy multi criteria decision making (FMCDM) and Borda. International Journal of Operation and Quantitave Management, 25(3), 153-174. http://repository.sttal.ac.id/id/eprint/447
Tang, J., Deng, C., Huang, G.-B., & Zhao, B. (2015). Compressed-domain ship detection on spaceborne optical image using deep neural network and extreme learning machine. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 53(3), 1174-1185. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2014.2335751
Van Hespen, I. (2016). Developing the concept of maritime piracy: A comparative legal analysis of international law and domestic criminal legislation. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 31(2), 279-314. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718085-12341395
Vargas Suárez, R. A., Cuervo Vásquez, N., & Moloeznik, M. P. (2021). Propuesta de un modelo de medición del poder marítimo de las naciones. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, 19(34), 267-306. https://doi.org/10.21830/19006586.759
Vogel, B., Reichard, R. J., Saša, B., & Černe, M. (2021). A bibliometric review of the leadership development field: How we got here, where we are, and where we are headed. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(5), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101381
Wilson, B. (2016). Human rights and maritime law enforcement. Stanford Journal of International Law, 52(2), 244-319. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2820578
Xie, E., Reddy, K., & Liang, J. (2017). Countryspecific determinants of cross-border mergers and acquisitions: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business, 52(2), 127-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.12.005
Yang, Z., Wang, J., Bonsall, S., & Fang, Q. (2009). Use of fuzzy evidential reasoning in maritime security assessment. Risk Analysis, 29(1), 95-120. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01158.x
Zhou, Z. (2008). Maritime security and the common interests of India and China. Frontiers of Law in China, 3, 363-371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11463-006-0015-4
Zou, Z., & Shi, Z. (2016). Ship detection in spaceborne optical image with SVD networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 54(10), 5832-5845. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2016.2572736
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides free and immediate access to its content (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages), under the principle that making research available to the public free of charge supports greater global knowledge exchange. This means that the authors transfer the Copyrights to the journal, so that the material can be copied and distributed by any means, as long as the authors’ recognition is maintained, and the articles are not commercially used or modified in any way.
