Simple visual reaction times and the Multiphasic Sex Inventory: Gender differences
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v14i2.1573Keywords:
sexual interest, reaction times, gender, psychological evaluationAbstract
Gender differences were analyzed in relation to two sexual interest evaluation strategies: a reduced ad-hoc version of the Multiphasic Sex Inventory (MSI) and a measurement task of Visual Reaction Times (VRT) to Sexual Stimuli. With an incidental sample of 60 individuals, psychometric properties of a 56 items version of the MSI were analyzed. The VRT was a computer-based heterosexual, homosexual, adults, children, and neutral images test. Results show an acceptable internal reliability of several MSI subscales, and construct validity among them. In the MSI, men showed more cognitive distortions and sexual obsessions, as well as early starting in sexual activities and less social desirability in sexual matters. Regarding to VRT, women spent less time on adult images (Cohen’s d: 0.85, and more on children (d: 0.61) and neutral images (d: 0.75). Several significant correlations between MSI subscales and VRT dimensions were found.
Downloads
References
Abel, G. Huffman, J., Warberg, B., & Holland, C. (1998). Visual Reaction Time and Plethysmography as Measures of Sexual Interest in Child Molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, (10), 81-95. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022063214826
Brevers, D., Cleeremans, A., Bechara, A., Laloyaux, C., Kornreich, C., Verbanck, P., & Noël, X. (2011). Time Course of Attentional Bias for Gambling Information in Problem Gambling. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 25(4), 675-682. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024201
Burn, M., & Brown, S. (2006). A Review of the Cognitive Distortions in Child Sex Offenders: An Examination of the Motivations and Mechanisms that Underlie the Justification for Abuse. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 11(3), 225-236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.08.002
Cáceres, J. (2001). Parafilias y violación. Síntesis.
Cáceres, J. (2006). La evaluación de las parafilias. In V. Caballo (Ed.). Manual para la evaluación de los trastornos psicológicos: trastornos de la edad adulta e informes psicológicos. Pirámide.
Casas, F. (1989). Técnicas de investigación social: indicadores sociales y psicosociales. Promociones y Publicaciones Universitarias, PPU.
Coric, V., Feuerstein, S., Fortunati, F., Southwick, S., Temporini, H., & Morgan, C. (2005). Assessing Sex Offenders. Psychiatry, 2(11), 26-29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2993520/
Coronado Mares, A., & Turvey, B. (2018). Chapter 7 - False Allegations in Divorce and Custody Proceedings. In B. Turvey, J. O. Savino & A. Coronado Mares (Eds.). False Allegations: Investigative and Forensic Issues in Fraudulent Reports (135-163). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801250-5.00007-0
Craig, L. A., Browne, K. D., Stringer, I., & Hogue, T. (2008). Sexual Reconviction Rates in the United Kingdom and Actuarial Risk Estimates. Child Abuse & Neglect, 32(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.09.002
Christopher, K., Lutz-Zois, C., & Reinhardt, A. (2007). Female Sexual Offenders: Personality Pathology as a Mediator of the Relationship between Childhood Sexual Abuse History and Sexual Abuse Perpetration Against Others. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31(8), 871-883. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2007.02.006
Der, G., & Deary, I. (2006). Age and Sex Differences in Reaction Time in Adulthood: Results from the United Kingdom Health and Lifestyle Survey. Psychology and Aging, 21(1), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.21.1.62
Dowling, N., Smith, D., Proeve, M., & Lee, J. (2000). The Multiphasic Sex Inventory: a Comparison of American and Australian Samples of Sexual Offenders. Australian Psychologist, 35(3), 244-248. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060008257486
Dykiert, D., Der, G., Starr, J., & Deary, I. J. (2012). Sex Differences in Reaction Time Mean and Intraindividual Variability Across the Lifespan. Development Psychology, 48(5): 1262-1276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027550
Echeburúa, E., & Guerricaechevarría, C. (2000). Abuso sexual en la infancia: víctimas y agresores. Ariel.
Garrido, V., Round, S., Gil, A., Torres, G., Soler, C., & Beneyto, M. (1993). Els délinquants sexuels les en pressons. Generalitat de Catalunya.
Garrido, V., & Beneyto, M. (1995). El control de la agresión sexual: un programa de tratamiento para delincuentes sexuales en prisión y en la comunidad. Cristóbal Serrano Villalba.
Garrido, V. (2003). Psicópatas y otros delincuentes violentos. Tirant lo Blanch.
Hanson, R., & Morton-Bourgon, K. (2005). The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-analysis of Recidivism Studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73(6), 1154-1163. https://doi.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.1154
Heiskanen, M. (2010). Trends in Police Recorded Crime. In S. Harrendorf, M. Heiskanen & S. Malby (Eds.). International Statistics on Crime and Justice. European Institute for Crime Prevention and Control. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/801535?ln=es
Jacobsen, L., Knudsen, A., Krogh, E., Pallesen, S. & Molde, H. (2007). An Overview of Cognitive Mechanisms in Pathological Gambling. Nordic Psychology, 59(4), 347-361. https://doi.org/10.1027/1901-2276.59.4.347
Jain, A., Bansal, R., Kumar, A., & Singh, K. (2015). A Comparative Study of Visual and Auditory Reaction Times on the Basis of Gender and Physical Activity Levels of Medical First Year. International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research, (2), 124-127. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-516X.157168
Kalichman, S., Henderson, M., Shealy, L., & Dwyer, M. (1992). Psychometric Properties of the Multiphasic Sex Inventory in Assessing Sex Offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior. 19(4), 384-396. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854892019004003
Kalmus, E., & Beech, A. (2003). Forensic Assessment of Sexual Interest: a Review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, (10), 193-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2003.12.002
Kandil, F., Olk, B., & Hilgetag, C. (2017). Female vs. Male Ampelmännchen -Gender-Specific Reaction Times to Male and Female Traffic Light Figures. Frontiers in Psychology, (8), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00690
Lanyon, R. (2001). Psychological Assessment Procedures in Sex Offending. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 32(3), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7028.32.3.253
Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The Socialization of Gender. In J. Grusec & P. Hastings (Eds.). Handbook of Socialization: Theory and Research (chapter 32). The Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-23344-022
Letourneau, E. (2002). A Comparison of Objective Measures of Sexual Arousal and Interest: Visual Reaction Time and Penile Plethysmography. Sexual Abuse, 14(3), 207-223. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015366324325
Love, R., Sloan, L., & Schmidt, M. (1976). Viewing Pornography and Sex Guilt: The Priggish, the Prudent, and the Profligate. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 44(4), 624-629. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-006X.44.4.624
Mackaronis, J., Strassberg, D., & Marcus, D. (2011). The Latent Structure of Multiphasic Sex Inventory–Assessed Pedophilic Interest. Psychological Assessment, 23(4), 1017-1022. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024625
Mathew, J., Masson, G., & Danion, F. (2020). Sex Differences in Visuomotor Tracking. Scientific Reports, (10), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68069-0
Mearns, J., Patchett, E., & Catanzaro, S. (2009). Multitrait -multimethod Matrix Validation of the Negative Mood Regulation Scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(5), 910–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2009.05.003
Montañés, S., Poy, R., Tormo, M., Pastor, M., Segarra, P., & Moltó, J. (2000, Jul. 23). Psychopaths Spend less Time Looping at Affective Pictures because of their Antisociality [Conference]. XXVII International Congress of Psychology. Stockholm.
Policía Nacional de Colombia (2016). Tablas estadísticas de delitos 2015. Revista Criminalidad, 58 (2), 21-62.
Rincón, M. (2007). El síndrome de alienación parental a debate. In R. Arce, F. Fariña, E. Alfaro, C. Civera & F. Tortosa (Eds.). Psicología jurídica: Evaluación e Intervención. Diputación de Valencia.
Romero, J. (2006). Nuestros presos. EOS.
Ruiz, J. (2014). Evaluación psicológica forense en acusados de delitos sexuales. In E. García-López (Ed.). Psicopatología forense: comportamiento humano y tribunales de justicia (pp. 266-288). Manual Moderno.
Rupp, H., & Wallen, K. (2007). Sex Differences in Viewing Sexual Stimuli: An Eye-tracking Study in Men and Women. Hormones and Behavior, 51(4), 524-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.008
Silverman, I. (2006). Sex Differences in Simple Visual Reaction Time: A Historical Meta-Analysis. Sex Roles, (54), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-8869-6
Spraggon, C. (2002). Seminario sobre seguridad y convivencia - Violencia sexual en Bogotá. Secretaría de Gobierno – Compensar. Unfinished text.
Valencia, O., Labrador, M., & Peña, M. (2010). Características demográficas y psicosociales de los agresores sexuales. Diversitas: Perspectivas en Psicología, 6(2), 297-308. http://doi.org/10.15332/s1794-9998.2010.0002.06
Vizard, E. (2007). Adolescent Sexual Offenders. Psychiatry, 6(10), 433-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mppsy.2007.08.001
Ward, T. (2000). Sexual Offenders' Cognitive Distortions as Implicit Theories. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 5(5), 491-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(98)00036-6
Ward, T., & Beech, A. (2006). An Integrated Theory of Sexual Offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 44-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2005.05.002
White, J., McMullin, D., Swartout, K., Sechrist, S., & Gollehon, A. (2008). Violence in intimate Relationships: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination of Sexual and Physical Aggression. Children and Youth Services Review, 30(3), 338-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.10.003
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2022-09-27 (4)
- 2022-09-26 (3)
- 2022-08-31 (2)
- 2022-06-30 (1)
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides free and immediate access to its content (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages), under the principle that making research available to the public free of charge supports greater global knowledge exchange. This means that the authors transfer the Copyrights to the journal, so that the material can be copied and distributed by any means, as long as the authors’ recognition is maintained, and the articles are not commercially used or modified in any way.
