Approaching production from a sustainable perspective: the case of small and medium businesses in Cundinamarca

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v13i1.1286

Keywords:

sustainable production, cleaner technologies, ecodesign, clean production, enterprises

Abstract

A sustainable approach to production pursues the economic and social development of companies without harming the environment. Based on this principle, this study characterized SMEs in the department of Cundinamarca, Colombia, using indicators to measure achievements in sustainable production. Descriptive, non-experimental field research was carried out. First, in order to identify indicators to be measured, a literature review was carried out by searching the Scopus, Emerald, ScienceDirect and Web of Science databases, within the 2009-2019 time window. A data collection instrument was constructed with 14 Likert-type questions. An intentional non-probabilistic sampling method was used which selected 105 companies. The instrument was validated by seven experts and was confirmed to be reliable by applying Cronbach's alpha. The results showed that SMEs must carry out structural transformations of their processes to be in harmony with social, environmental and economic systems, aspects that generally encompass sustainability. Additionally, clean production was found to be the element that requires the most work. Finally, the study showed that medium-sized enterprises are by and large more focused on sustainable production than small ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguayo, G. F., Peralta, Á. M., Lama, R. J., & Soltero, S. V. (2013). Ecodiseño ingeniería sostenible de la cuna a la cuna. RC Libros.

Ani, H., Gottschalk, D., & Kamath, V. K. (2017). Sustainability assessments and their implementation possibilities within the business models of companies. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 12, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2017.04.001

Arana, G., Landeta, B., Ruiz, P., & Díaz, P. (2013). Análisis de los efectos de la adopción de estándares de ecodiseño en el rendimiento empresarial de los estudios de arquitectura. DYNA, 80(181), 201-209.

Atienza, S. L. (2010). La energía eléctrica y el desarrollo sostenible. Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto, 42, 15-40.

Badiru, A. (2010). The many languages of sustainability: IE’s should push for better resource utilization across all fields. Industrial Engineer, 42(11), 30-37.

Blanco, C. F. (2005). Química verde, desarrollo (in)sostenible y competitividad. Comisiones Obreras, 6, 223-236.

Capuz, R. S., & Gómez, N. T. (2014). Ecodiseño, ingeniería del ciclo de vida para el desarrollo de productos sostenible. Alfaomega Grupo Editor.

Cardona, A. M., & Gutiérrez, J. A. (2010). Elementos en el fortalecimiento de los mundos de producción de las pymes en Colombia desde la organización y las políticas. Pensamiento & Gestión, 28, 107-131.

Devoto, L. (2016). La sustentabilidad en las pymes, ¿es posible? Cuadernos del Centro de Estudios de Diseño y Comunicación, 57, 105-123.

Duque, C. N., Garetti, M., & Sperandio, S. (2009). From product end-of-life sustainable considerations to design management. En B. Vallespir, & T. Alix (Eds.), Advances in production management systems. new challenges, new approaches.

APMS 2009. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology (Vol. 338, pp. 152-159). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-16358-6_20

Ehrenfeld, J. (2008). Sustainability by besign. a subversive strategy for transforming our consumer culture. Yale University Press.

Ferraz, J., & Ramos, L. (2018). Inclusión financiera para la inserción productiva de las empresas de menor tamaño en América Latina: innovaciones, factores determinantes y prácticas de las instituciones financieras de desarrollo. Cepal.

Fiori, S. (2005). Diseño industrial sustentable. una percepción desde las ciencias sociales. Editorial Brujas.

Garetti, M., & Taisch, M. (2012). Sustainable manufacturing: trends and research challenges. Production planning & control: the management of operations, 23(2-3), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2011.591619

Gonzales, E, M., Hommes, M., & Mirmulstein, L. M. (2014). MSME Country Indicators. Towards a better understanding of micro, small, and medium enterprises. Analysis note. Corporación Financiera Internacional (CFI).

González, A., Urdaneta, K., & Muñoz, D. (2017). Liderazgo organizacional y responsabilidad socioambiental, una mirada desde la complejidad y postmodernidad. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 22(77), 11-23.

Jackson, T. (2009). Prosperity without growth. Economics for a finite planet. Earthscan.

Jovane, F., Seliger, G., & Stock, T. (2017). Competitive sustainable globalization general considerations and perspectives. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 1-19.

Morioka, S. N., Bolis, I., & Carvalho, M. (2018). From an ideal dream towards reality analysis: proposing sustainable value exchange matrix (SVEM) from systematic literature review on sustainable business models and face validation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178(3), 76-88.

Otzen, T., & Manterola, C. (2017). Técnicas de muestreo sobre una población a estudio. International Journal of Morphology, 35(1), 227-232. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022017000100037

Patala, S., Jalkala, A., Keränen, J., Väisänen, S., Tuominen, V., & Soukka, R. (2016). Sustainable value propositions: framework and implications for technology suppliers. Industrial Marketing Management, 59, 144-156.

Quero, M. (2010). Confiabilidad y coeficiente alpha de Cronbach. Revista de Estudios Interdiciplinarios en Ciencias Sociales, 12(2), 248-252.

Sebhatu, S. P., Johnson, M., & Enquist, B. (2016). Service innovation in a complex service system: public transit service sustainability business cases. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 224, 269-275.

Torre, M. G. (2011). Ecología industrial: innovación y desarrollo sostenible en sistemas industriales. Revista Internacional de Sostenibilidad, Tecnología y Humanismo, 6, 60-70.

Published

2021-01-01

How to Cite

Approaching production from a sustainable perspective: the case of small and medium businesses in Cundinamarca. (2021). Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología, 13(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v13i1.1286