Incidence of odor discrimination in the training of substance detection canine teams: impact of its evaluation for final certification
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22335/rlct.v12i1.1003Keywords:
Working dogs, evaluation test, canine performance, canine certification, detector dogs, odor discrimination, behaviorAbstract
The Colombia National Police, selects, trains and certifies canine team, determining which dogs are Fit or Not Fit to start training, continue and verify its subsequent performance. Therefore, the objectives of this research were: 1). Determine the incidence of odor discrimination during the training and final certification of canine substances detectors and 2). Establish the correlation between odor discrimination, perseverance and alertness during "blind tests". The results prove the hypothesis that when performing blind tests in training, using real records and discriminating the smell, a greater number of canine equipment is obtained in the final certification. It is evident that the precision to discriminate target odors is 99% (percentage of detected targets) and specificity of 96% (percentage of correctly discriminated targets), with statistically significant results for the majority of the behavioral variables analyzed individually (P < 0,05) and a level of agreement between the evaluators (Kappa de Cohen) almost perfect for most of the tests, concluding that the warning signs in real contexts, carrying out the blind tests during the training and final certification, make the binomials to being exposed to noise, presence of people and other animals, improve their operational results.
Downloads
References
Arnott, E., Early, J., Wade, C., & McGreevy P. (2014a). Estimating the economic value of Australian stock herding dogs. Animal Welfare, 23(2), 189 – 197. http://dx.doi.org/10.7120/09627286.23.2.189
Brady, K., Cracknell, N., Zulch, H., & Mills, DS. (2018). A systematic review of the reliability and validity of behavioural tests used to assess behavioural characteristics important in working dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 5, 103. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2018.00103
Bray, E., Levy, K., Kennedy, B., Duffy, D., Serpell, J., & MacLean, E. (2019). Predictive models of assistance dog training outcomes using the canine behavioral assessment and research questionnaire and a standardized temperament evaluation. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 6, 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2019.00049
Doring, D., Haberland, B., Bauer, A., Britta, D., Dobenecker, B., Hack, R., Schmidt, J., & Erhard, M. (2016). Behavioral observations in dogs in four research facilities: Do they use their enrichment? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 13, 55-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2016.04.002
Dorriety, J. (2007). Cadaver dogs as a forensic tool: An analysis of prior studies. Journal of Forensic Identification, 57(5): 717-725.
Furton, K., Greb, J., & Holness, H. (2010). The scientific working group on dog and orthogonal detector guidelines (SWGDOG), 2005-IJ-CX-K031.
Goss, K. (2019). The physical chemistry of odors — Consequences for the work with detection dogs. Forensic Science International., 296, 110 – 114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.01.023
Hayes, J., McGreevy, P., Forbes, S., Laing, G., & Stuetza, R. (2018). Critical review of dog detection and the influences of physiology, training and analytical methodologies. Talanta., 185, 499 – 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2018.04.010
Laflamme, D. (1997). Development and validation of a body condition score system for dogs. Canine Practice., 22, 10 - 15.
Landis, J., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics., 33, 159 - 174.
Lazarowski, L., Foster, L., Gruen, L., Sherman, B., Fish, R.,
Milgram, N., & Dorman, D. (2015). Olfactory discrimination and generalization of ammonium nitrate and structurally related odorants in Labrador retrievers. Animal Cognition. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10071-015-0894-9
Lazarowski, L., Waggoner, P., & Katz, J. (2019). The Future of Detector Dog Research. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews. ISSN: 1911-4745. http://dx.doi.org/10.3819/CCBR.2019.140008
Policía Nacional de Colombia. (2010b). Manual de antinarcóticos para la erradicación manual de cultivos ilícitos. Oficina de Planeación. Bogotá: Imprenta nacional de Colombia. http://www.mamacoca.org/docs_de_base/Cifras_cuadro_mamacoca/34.pdf.
Policía Nacional de Colombia. (2019). Directiva Administrativa Transitoria No. 023. “Plan anual de formación, educación continua e investigación (PAE) para el personal de la Policía Nacional 2019-2020”. Oficina de Planeación.
Porritt, F., Mansson, R., Berry, A., Cook, N., Sibbald, N., & Nicklin, S. (2015). Validation of a short odour discrimination test for working dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 165, 133–142.
Oficina de las Naciones Unidas contra la Droga y el Delito (UNODC). (2019). Sistema integrado de monitoreo de cultivos ilícitos (SIMCI). Monitoreo de territorios afectados por cultivos ilícitos 2018. https://www.unodc.org/documents/colombia/2019/Agosto/Informe_de_Monitoreo_de_Territorios_Afectador_por_Cultivos_Ilicitos_en_Colombia_2018_.pdf.
Prada, P., & Chavez, M. (2015). Demining dogs in Colombia – A review of operational challenges, chemical perspectives and practical implications, Science & Justice, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2016.03.002
Prada, P., Curran, A., & Furton, K. (2015). Human scent evidence. Ed. CRC Press, Boca Ratón, ISBN: 1466583959.
Prada-Tiedemann, P.A., Rojas-Guevara, J.U., Bohorquez, G.A., Ochoa-Torres, M.X., y Córdoba-Parra, J.D. (2019). Los equipos caninos policiales: importancia de los criterios de selección, entrenamiento, certificación y rendimiento. Bogotá: Editorial Policía Nacional de Colombia.
Presidential Program for Comprehensive Action against Anti-Personnel Mines (PAICMA). (2019). Accessible at http://www.accioncontraminas.gov.co/estadisticas/Paginas/victimas-minas-antipersonal.aspx.
Raymer, J., Rojas-Guevara, J., & Prada-Tiedemann, P. (2020, en prensa). Evaluation of decomposition residual odor using sus scrofa as a sampling model. Revista Criminalidad, 62 (2).
Rojas-Guevara, J., Cordoba-Parra, J., Cajiao, M., Bohorquez, G., Prada-Tiedemann, P., y Gonzalez-Forero, R. (2020) (en prensa). Equipos caninos detectores de animales silvestres en Colombia: estrategia del Sistema de Seguridad Rural Policial en el Postconflicto. En Tensiones, retos y apuestas de las disciplinas en la construcción de la paz, la ruralidad y la sustentabilidad a partir del acuerdo de paz en Colombia. Fundación Universitaria Agraria de Colombia. (1ª ed.). Sello Editorial Uniagrarista.
Rooney, N., Gaines, S.A., Bradshaw, J., & Penman, S. (2007). Validation of a method for assessing the ability of trainee specialist search dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 103, 90 – 104.
Rooney, N., Clark, C., & Casey, R. (2016). Minimizing fear and anxiety in working dogs: A review. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 16, 53 – 64.
Sinn, D., Gosling, S., & Hilliard, S. (2010). Personality and performance in military working dogs: Reliability and predictive validity of behavioral tests. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 127, 1 – 2, 51-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2010.08.007
Troisi, C. A., Mills, D. S., Wilkinson, A., & Zulch, H. E. (2019). Behavioral and cognitive factors that affect the success of scent detection dogs. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 14, 51-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.3819/ccbr.2019.140007
Villarreal, C., Rojas, J., & Ochoa, M. (2018). Operational impact of canine teams in the fight against drug trafficking in Colombia: Review of their contribution, strategies and recent trends. Scientific and Technical Review, 37 (1). http://dx.doi.org/10.20506/rst.37.1.2751
Wilson, E., & Sinn, D. (2012). Are there differences between behavioral measurement methods? A comparison of the predictive validity of two ratings methods in a working dog program. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 141, (3 – 4), 158-172. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.08.012
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2019 Revista Logos Ciencia & Tecnología
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides free and immediate access to its content (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode#languages), under the principle that making research available to the public free of charge supports greater global knowledge exchange. This means that the authors transfer the Copyrights to the journal, so that the material can be copied and distributed by any means, as long as the authors’ recognition is maintained, and the articles are not commercially used or modified in any way.